Lanterns of Liberty

Socialism fundamentally takes all the rights away from its people. It is the grasping of all power by a totalitarian government or dictator. In previous totalitarian governments implementing socialism, a bloody revolution was conducted much like that of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the Nazi Revolution in Germany, the revolution led by Mao, and the revolution led by Castro. In all of these cases massive failures prompted by elitist leaders led to over 200 million deaths.

Modern Socialists, Communists, and Progressives believe that other than the massive deaths experienced under these regimes, the socialist agenda is a valid and successful system. Fabian Socialists, Frankfurt Marxists, apostles of Saul Alinsky and those that have been brain washed by the radical progressive university curriculum, have moved away from the radical revolution to the radical views on evolution.

This evolution is not exclusive to the teachings of Darwin but rather evolution of humanity. Progressives believe that their progression is more relative to an evolution. It is more of an evolution of individual freedom to that of individual sacrifice for the sake of the whole American population and even the world. This progression is led by the education of the population from the radical progressive teachings of members of the intellectual elite. It is a progression away from the intangible God to the more tangible human intellectual as a source of inspiration.

The Radical University Professor

What has occurred with this new worship of intellectualism is the college professor. The experience of teaching the desiring thirsty student gives the professor a power like no other. This power is rooted in molding young impressionable minds regardless of the message. The teacher-student relationship is scared and fundamental aspect in the Gnostic circles that we call university. Sadly these circles have been infiltrated by professors who teach subjective discussion rather than objective reasoning. Understand that this is in no means condemning all college professors for they are valued and needed. This is an attempt to simply expose subjective curriculums rather than objective ones. These subjective discussions are separated from the realities of everyday life and rooted in ideological circumstantial perfection defined by the professor. The professor dwells within his own theoretical ideal world that he created and spills his thoughts and beliefs to the student as some form of proverbial mental masturbation.

The Radical Media University

After Cronkite changed the way news was delivered to the public with the injection of subjective discussion, the new university was realized. More and more people purchased televisions. It became a huge influence on the American people. It became not only a source of entertainment but eventually became a source of education. Later it would be a vehicle for propaganda. Intellectual elitists entered journalism. They viewed the media as not just an avenue for news but also a way to educate the public. The majority of the public was not educated with college degrees. The idea of mass media as a way to educate was great in theory until subjective discussion became the focus rather than objective discussions. It wasn’t long before Cronkite began speaking out against the Vietnam War in a populist move which Lyndon Johnson later stated that he had lost Middle American when he lost Cronkite.

So how does environmentalism fit into this argument? The public has become so trusting of the media that it doesn’t question the stories that it covers. The majority of the public for so many years has taken for granted that the news that they were watching every night was fact. They began to enjoy the personalities they say like Rather, Brokaw, and Jennings. These media elitists took the baton from Cronkite and delivered the news in the new and improved subjective way. Environmentalism along with Global Warming became a new Vietnam War as the public took all of the news agencies claims as fact. The news then became drama as the public became riveted by the tragic destruction that the media was painting or should I dare say spinning.

The large cultural quilt that the media agencies were weaving was intended to bring the people together in unity. The intentions were good. Everyone trusted Cronkite, Rather, Brokaw, and Jennings until cable news and independent internet media began to expose the other side. The corporate juggernauts then began investing in media agencies to help propagate future endeavors. Most notably, General Electric purchased 80% of MSNBC with Microsoft owning the other 20%. These two companies have used the news agency as a pulpit for market influencing propaganda including the Global Warming / Climate Change agenda as it has huge amounts of money at stake in alternative energy and smart grid technology. By no means are the other media agencies innocent in their biased media delivery. NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox News, CNN, and CNBC are all heavily influenced by the corporate world and do take consideration when delivering news to the world. Fortunately they have differing stances to allow the public to not trust their every word and spun stories. They have freed us from the unchallenged media bias of network mainstream media.

As the media world fights over the climb to the top, the American people observe all that is shared by the media. In most cases Americans can clearly see the bias when it is delivered. There is still some blind devotion but the ratings shift tells the story to who is most trusted. What has raged as the news story of the last decade is Global Warming. With increasing Sun Spot cycles an ignored significance, global temperatures seemed to increase. The media jumped on the bandwagon of man-made-Global-Warming as proclaimed by the university elite. Instead of doing the proper objective journalism, the admiration and adoration for the university elitists took hold and subjective journalism took place instead.

The story of Global Warming ran feverously through the media spotlight. Little did the media or public know that this was fabricated by the Progressive movement to pass an Enviro-Socialist agenda. They could influence legislation that would allow massive wealth distribution. It was to be spun into a human rights issue as they reported that countries all around the world we being overtaken and swallowed by the rising oceans when water levels remained subdued here at home. It was an ideal way to take mass amounts of American generated wealth and distribute it to the oppressed people of third world nations regardless of the third world bureaucracies that would swallow up the money for their own tyrannical pleasures. Independent news agencies would later unveil the false science.

Himalayan Glacier scandal

Climate Gate

Hacked Climate Emails who’s who

If you wish to reply, Login here.